
VOLUME 5, NUMBER 2
Article
Legal Protection of Trade Secrets in the People’s
Republic of China
Yuan Cheng
261
Translation
An Explanation of Japan’s Product Liability Law
Thomas Leo Madden
299
Comments
Suburban Sprawl of Suburban Villages?
Defining Planning Principles for New Land Development in
Indonesia
Stephen Day
331
Why Japan’s New Product Liability Law Isn’t
Andrews
Marcuse
365
Russian Dumping of Radioactive Wastes in the Sea of
Japan: An Opportunity to Evaluate the Effectiveness of the London
Convention 1972
James R. McCullagh
399
Deforestation in Cambodia and Malaysia: The Case
for an International Legal Solution
Heather A. Wolf
429
Legal
Protection of Trade Secrets in the People’s Republic of China
Yuan Cheng
Abstract: The increasing need
for an adequate legal framework for the protection of trade secrets in
the People's Republic of China led to the 1993 promulgation of the Law
for Countering Unfair Competition ("LCUC"). The LCUC has
removed some of the barriers to obtaining effective remedies. Under the
LCUC, the injured party can rely on a legal definition of "trade
secrets," sue third parties, and expect that authorities will
investigate violations. Nevertheless, barriers to adequate protection
for trade secrets remain. In discussing the legal framework for trade
secrets protection, this Article illustrates how the ambiguity of the
LCUC's relationship with other remedies - especially in the
employer-employee context - tends to undermine the LCUC's effectiveness
in offering injured parties a sufficient choice of remedies.
An
Explanation of Japan’s Product Liability Law
Thomas Leo
Madden
Translator's
Introduction:
Japan has been contemplating the implementation of a product
liability system since 1972. After much discussion, the Product
Liability Law (Law No. 85 (1994)) was finally promulgated on July 1,
1994. It came into force one year later on July 1, 1995. In Japanese the
law is called Seizôbutsu Sekinin Hô.
The original article explains the law's historical significance
and practical impact. It is commentary in style and is meant to serve as
a basic guideline to help both consumers and businesses understand their
respective rights and obligations under this new law.
Suburban
Sprawl of Suburban Villages? Defining
Planning Principles for New Land Development in Indonesia
Stephen Day
Abstract: Indonesian
land use regulations are increasingly designating areas where urban
growth is either targeted or excluded, echoing a similar trend in other
Pacific Rim nations. Yet as with growth planning in the United States,
there is a near total lack of regulatory direction guiding the form or
pattern of urban development within the target areas. Sprawling suburban
development, essentially patterned after mid-century-style American
models, is rapidly consuming the most desirable developable land.
Although significant policy goals and legislation are emerging that may
provide the basis for suburban land planning principles, neither the
central nor provincial governments have consistently articulated such
principles. This Comment suggests that statutes should incorporate not
only planning goals, but also specific town-building principles to guide
local planning authorities. Growth management policy goals that are at
the forefront of planning law in the United States are compared with
evolving Indonesian policies and with what is actually being built in
response to those policies. Historical shortcomings in U.S. suburban
planning suggest that alternatives to automobile-dependent suburban
development should be considered in the formation of Indonesian land use
law and policy. The Comment describes specific alternative models of
development that have been built or are being projected.
Why
Japan’s New Product Liability Law Isn’t
Andrews
Marcuse
Abstract: The
statutory language of Japan's 1994 Products Liability Act envisions a
strict liability regime that would replace the previous negligence-based
regime. This Comment reviews the development of the previous products
liability regime, then analyzes the 1994 Products Liability Act in
relation to Civil Code articles 415, 570, and 709 as well as EC
Directive 85/374, and the 1975 Draft Model Law on Products Liability.
The Comment concludes that because the 1994 Products Liability Act
incorporates the Civil Code articles and their judicial interpretations,
without addressing any of several structural and procedural barriers to
suit, the 1994 Products Liability Act cannot and will not impose strict
liability on manufacturers.
Russian
Dumping of Radioactive Wastes in the Sea of Japan: An Opportunity to
Evaluate the Effectiveness of the London Convention 1972
James R.
McCullagh
Abstract: By
dumping 900 tons of radioactive waste into the Sea of Japan on October,
13, 1993, the Russian navy violated the moratorium on low-level
radioactive waste dumping of the London Convention (the international
treaty controlling ocean dumping). However, legal liability under the
London Convention, the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the
Sea, and international customary law arguably does not attach to this
activity. Indeed, even though the London Convention was amended in
November of 1993 to prohibit all ocean dumping of radioactive waste,
Russia remains legally entitled to use the ocean as a disposal site for
low-level wastes as a result of its formal objection to the amendment.
Further, it is suggested that activity and ecosystem-specific
regulations merely transfer the risks associated with the activity and
may actually result in greater environmental harm. For this reason, the
London Convention and indeed all international agreements should
consider the global impacts of environmental regulations prior to
prohibiting an activity.
Deforestation
in Cambodia and Malaysia: The Case for an International Legal Solution
Heather A.
Wolf
Abstract: The logging of
tropical timber for the export market is the primary cause of
deforestation in Southeast Asia. The problem of controlling the tropical
timber trade has been addressed on both the national and international
level. The existing legal mechanisms, however, have proven to be
inadequate. A new multilateral agreement based on the import and export
permit system of the Basel Agreement is necessary to control the timber
trade and to aid in halting deforestation.
|