| Article | Title | Author |
| 2 |
TrademarkDilution.com: Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp., and the Evolving Law of Trademark Dilution on the Internet
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 1 |
Broadening the Scope of Electronic Reproductions: The Interpretation of Section 201(c) in Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc.
abstract
full article
|
Shan Sivalingam |
| 3 |
Podcasting Pop Songs?: Licensing Concerns with Podcasts that contain Mainstream music
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 4 |
Patent Rights Under FOSS Licensing Schemes
abstract
full article
|
Shaobin Zhu |
| 2 |
Liability for Search Engine Triggering of Trademarked Keywords after Rescuecom
abstract
full article
|
Riana Pfefferkorn |
| 1 |
Walking from Cloud to Cloud: The Portability Issue in Cloud Computing
abstract
full article
|
Robert H. Carpenter, Jr. |
| 13 |
A Matter of Access: How Bypassing DRM Does Not Always Violate the DMCA
abstract
full article
|
Alicia Hoffer |
| 7 |
FRCP 19: A Preferable Alternative to Traditional Judicial Rules for Determining Patent Licensee Standing
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey Bashaw |
| 93 |
Neutralizing Actual Controversy: How Patent Holders Can Reduce the Risk of Declaratory Judgment in Patent Disputes
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 105 |
End User Liability for Software Developed with Trade Secrets
abstract
full article
|
Jeff Patterson |
| 135 |
Cross-Border Contributory Patent Infringement in Germany
abstract
full article
|
Prof. Dr. Heinz Goddar |
| 149 |
Copyright Infringement Liability of Placeshifting Services in the United States and Japan
abstract
full article
|
Naoya Isoda |
| 8 |
Copyright Liability for Those Who Provide the Means of Infringement: In light of the RIAA lawsuits, who is at risk for the infringing acts of others?
abstract
full article
|
Karen Horowitz |
| 14 |
The Limits of Expanding Patent Claim Scope to Provoke an Interference with a Competitor
abstract
full article
|
Christopher L. Kuyper |
| 171 |
The "Three Strikes" Policy in Korean Copyright Act 2009: Safe or Out?
abstract
full article
|
Sun-Young Moon & Daeup Kim |
| 217 |
“Capital” Punishment: Evaluating an Investor’s Secondary Copyright Infringement Liability after Veoh
abstract
full article
|
James L. Proctor, Jr. |
| 233 |
Exportability’s Effect on Process Patent Enforcement: Why § 271(f) Export Restrictions Do Not Apply to Intangible Process Claims
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 247 |
How Much is too Much? Copyright Protection of Short Portions of Text in the United States and European Union after Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades
abstract
full article
|
Connor Moran |
| 237 |
Cheaper Watches and Copyright Law: Navigating “Gray Markets” After the Supreme Court’s Split in Costco v. Omega, S.A.
abstract
full article
|
Parker A. Howell |
| 265 |
Loaded Question: Examining Loadable Kernel Modules Under the General Public License v2
abstract
full article
|
Curt Blake and Joseph Probst |
| 2 |
TrademarkDilution.com: Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp., and the Evolving Law of Trademark Dilution on the Internet
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 1 |
Broadening the Scope of Electronic Reproductions: The Interpretation of Section 201(c) in Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc.
abstract
full article
|
Shan Sivalingam |
| 3 |
Podcasting Pop Songs?: Licensing Concerns with Podcasts that contain Mainstream music
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 4 |
Patent Rights Under FOSS Licensing Schemes
abstract
full article
|
Shaobin Zhu |
| 2 |
Liability for Search Engine Triggering of Trademarked Keywords after Rescuecom
abstract
full article
|
Riana Pfefferkorn |
| 1 |
Walking from Cloud to Cloud: The Portability Issue in Cloud Computing
abstract
full article
|
Robert H. Carpenter, Jr. |
| 13 |
A Matter of Access: How Bypassing DRM Does Not Always Violate the DMCA
abstract
full article
|
Alicia Hoffer |
| 7 |
FRCP 19: A Preferable Alternative to Traditional Judicial Rules for Determining Patent Licensee Standing
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey Bashaw |
| 93 |
Neutralizing Actual Controversy: How Patent Holders Can Reduce the Risk of Declaratory Judgment in Patent Disputes
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 105 |
End User Liability for Software Developed with Trade Secrets
abstract
full article
|
Jeff Patterson |
| 135 |
Cross-Border Contributory Patent Infringement in Germany
abstract
full article
|
Prof. Dr. Heinz Goddar |
| 149 |
Copyright Infringement Liability of Placeshifting Services in the United States and Japan
abstract
full article
|
Naoya Isoda |
| 8 |
Copyright Liability for Those Who Provide the Means of Infringement: In light of the RIAA lawsuits, who is at risk for the infringing acts of others?
abstract
full article
|
Karen Horowitz |
| 14 |
The Limits of Expanding Patent Claim Scope to Provoke an Interference with a Competitor
abstract
full article
|
Christopher L. Kuyper |
| 171 |
The "Three Strikes" Policy in Korean Copyright Act 2009: Safe or Out?
abstract
full article
|
Sun-Young Moon & Daeup Kim |
| 217 |
“Capital” Punishment: Evaluating an Investor’s Secondary Copyright Infringement Liability after Veoh
abstract
full article
|
James L. Proctor, Jr. |
| 233 |
Exportability’s Effect on Process Patent Enforcement: Why § 271(f) Export Restrictions Do Not Apply to Intangible Process Claims
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 247 |
How Much is too Much? Copyright Protection of Short Portions of Text in the United States and European Union after Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades
abstract
full article
|
Connor Moran |
| 237 |
Cheaper Watches and Copyright Law: Navigating “Gray Markets” After the Supreme Court’s Split in Costco v. Omega, S.A.
abstract
full article
|
Parker A. Howell |
| 265 |
Loaded Question: Examining Loadable Kernel Modules Under the General Public License v2
abstract
full article
|
Curt Blake and Joseph Probst |
| 2 |
TrademarkDilution.com: Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp., and the Evolving Law of Trademark Dilution on the Internet
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 1 |
Broadening the Scope of Electronic Reproductions: The Interpretation of Section 201(c) in Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc.
abstract
full article
|
Shan Sivalingam |
| 3 |
Podcasting Pop Songs?: Licensing Concerns with Podcasts that contain Mainstream music
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 4 |
Patent Rights Under FOSS Licensing Schemes
abstract
full article
|
Shaobin Zhu |
| 2 |
Liability for Search Engine Triggering of Trademarked Keywords after Rescuecom
abstract
full article
|
Riana Pfefferkorn |
| 1 |
Walking from Cloud to Cloud: The Portability Issue in Cloud Computing
abstract
full article
|
Robert H. Carpenter, Jr. |
| 13 |
A Matter of Access: How Bypassing DRM Does Not Always Violate the DMCA
abstract
full article
|
Alicia Hoffer |
| 7 |
FRCP 19: A Preferable Alternative to Traditional Judicial Rules for Determining Patent Licensee Standing
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey Bashaw |
| 93 |
Neutralizing Actual Controversy: How Patent Holders Can Reduce the Risk of Declaratory Judgment in Patent Disputes
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 105 |
End User Liability for Software Developed with Trade Secrets
abstract
full article
|
Jeff Patterson |
| 135 |
Cross-Border Contributory Patent Infringement in Germany
abstract
full article
|
Prof. Dr. Heinz Goddar |
| 149 |
Copyright Infringement Liability of Placeshifting Services in the United States and Japan
abstract
full article
|
Naoya Isoda |
| 8 |
Copyright Liability for Those Who Provide the Means of Infringement: In light of the RIAA lawsuits, who is at risk for the infringing acts of others?
abstract
full article
|
Karen Horowitz |
| 14 |
The Limits of Expanding Patent Claim Scope to Provoke an Interference with a Competitor
abstract
full article
|
Christopher L. Kuyper |
| 171 |
The "Three Strikes" Policy in Korean Copyright Act 2009: Safe or Out?
abstract
full article
|
Sun-Young Moon & Daeup Kim |
| 217 |
“Capital” Punishment: Evaluating an Investor’s Secondary Copyright Infringement Liability after Veoh
abstract
full article
|
James L. Proctor, Jr. |
| 233 |
Exportability’s Effect on Process Patent Enforcement: Why § 271(f) Export Restrictions Do Not Apply to Intangible Process Claims
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 247 |
How Much is too Much? Copyright Protection of Short Portions of Text in the United States and European Union after Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades
abstract
full article
|
Connor Moran |
| 237 |
Cheaper Watches and Copyright Law: Navigating “Gray Markets” After the Supreme Court’s Split in Costco v. Omega, S.A.
abstract
full article
|
Parker A. Howell |
| 265 |
Loaded Question: Examining Loadable Kernel Modules Under the General Public License v2
abstract
full article
|
Curt Blake and Joseph Probst |
| 2 |
TrademarkDilution.com: Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp., and the Evolving Law of Trademark Dilution on the Internet
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 1 |
Broadening the Scope of Electronic Reproductions: The Interpretation of Section 201(c) in Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc.
abstract
full article
|
Shan Sivalingam |
| 3 |
Podcasting Pop Songs?: Licensing Concerns with Podcasts that contain Mainstream music
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 4 |
Patent Rights Under FOSS Licensing Schemes
abstract
full article
|
Shaobin Zhu |
| 2 |
Liability for Search Engine Triggering of Trademarked Keywords after Rescuecom
abstract
full article
|
Riana Pfefferkorn |
| 1 |
Walking from Cloud to Cloud: The Portability Issue in Cloud Computing
abstract
full article
|
Robert H. Carpenter, Jr. |
| 13 |
A Matter of Access: How Bypassing DRM Does Not Always Violate the DMCA
abstract
full article
|
Alicia Hoffer |
| 7 |
FRCP 19: A Preferable Alternative to Traditional Judicial Rules for Determining Patent Licensee Standing
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey Bashaw |
| 93 |
Neutralizing Actual Controversy: How Patent Holders Can Reduce the Risk of Declaratory Judgment in Patent Disputes
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 105 |
End User Liability for Software Developed with Trade Secrets
abstract
full article
|
Jeff Patterson |
| 135 |
Cross-Border Contributory Patent Infringement in Germany
abstract
full article
|
Prof. Dr. Heinz Goddar |
| 149 |
Copyright Infringement Liability of Placeshifting Services in the United States and Japan
abstract
full article
|
Naoya Isoda |
| 8 |
Copyright Liability for Those Who Provide the Means of Infringement: In light of the RIAA lawsuits, who is at risk for the infringing acts of others?
abstract
full article
|
Karen Horowitz |
| 14 |
The Limits of Expanding Patent Claim Scope to Provoke an Interference with a Competitor
abstract
full article
|
Christopher L. Kuyper |
| 171 |
The "Three Strikes" Policy in Korean Copyright Act 2009: Safe or Out?
abstract
full article
|
Sun-Young Moon & Daeup Kim |
| 217 |
“Capital” Punishment: Evaluating an Investor’s Secondary Copyright Infringement Liability after Veoh
abstract
full article
|
James L. Proctor, Jr. |
| 233 |
Exportability’s Effect on Process Patent Enforcement: Why § 271(f) Export Restrictions Do Not Apply to Intangible Process Claims
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 247 |
How Much is too Much? Copyright Protection of Short Portions of Text in the United States and European Union after Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades
abstract
full article
|
Connor Moran |
| 237 |
Cheaper Watches and Copyright Law: Navigating “Gray Markets” After the Supreme Court’s Split in Costco v. Omega, S.A.
abstract
full article
|
Parker A. Howell |
| 265 |
Loaded Question: Examining Loadable Kernel Modules Under the General Public License v2
abstract
full article
|
Curt Blake and Joseph Probst |
| 2 |
TrademarkDilution.com: Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp., and the Evolving Law of Trademark Dilution on the Internet
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 1 |
Broadening the Scope of Electronic Reproductions: The Interpretation of Section 201(c) in Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc.
abstract
full article
|
Shan Sivalingam |
| 3 |
Podcasting Pop Songs?: Licensing Concerns with Podcasts that contain Mainstream music
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 4 |
Patent Rights Under FOSS Licensing Schemes
abstract
full article
|
Shaobin Zhu |
| 2 |
Liability for Search Engine Triggering of Trademarked Keywords after Rescuecom
abstract
full article
|
Riana Pfefferkorn |
| 1 |
Walking from Cloud to Cloud: The Portability Issue in Cloud Computing
abstract
full article
|
Robert H. Carpenter, Jr. |
| 13 |
A Matter of Access: How Bypassing DRM Does Not Always Violate the DMCA
abstract
full article
|
Alicia Hoffer |
| 7 |
FRCP 19: A Preferable Alternative to Traditional Judicial Rules for Determining Patent Licensee Standing
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey Bashaw |
| 93 |
Neutralizing Actual Controversy: How Patent Holders Can Reduce the Risk of Declaratory Judgment in Patent Disputes
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 105 |
End User Liability for Software Developed with Trade Secrets
abstract
full article
|
Jeff Patterson |
| 135 |
Cross-Border Contributory Patent Infringement in Germany
abstract
full article
|
Prof. Dr. Heinz Goddar |
| 149 |
Copyright Infringement Liability of Placeshifting Services in the United States and Japan
abstract
full article
|
Naoya Isoda |
| 8 |
Copyright Liability for Those Who Provide the Means of Infringement: In light of the RIAA lawsuits, who is at risk for the infringing acts of others?
abstract
full article
|
Karen Horowitz |
| 14 |
The Limits of Expanding Patent Claim Scope to Provoke an Interference with a Competitor
abstract
full article
|
Christopher L. Kuyper |
| 171 |
The "Three Strikes" Policy in Korean Copyright Act 2009: Safe or Out?
abstract
full article
|
Sun-Young Moon & Daeup Kim |
| 217 |
“Capital” Punishment: Evaluating an Investor’s Secondary Copyright Infringement Liability after Veoh
abstract
full article
|
James L. Proctor, Jr. |
| 233 |
Exportability’s Effect on Process Patent Enforcement: Why § 271(f) Export Restrictions Do Not Apply to Intangible Process Claims
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 247 |
How Much is too Much? Copyright Protection of Short Portions of Text in the United States and European Union after Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades
abstract
full article
|
Connor Moran |
| 237 |
Cheaper Watches and Copyright Law: Navigating “Gray Markets” After the Supreme Court’s Split in Costco v. Omega, S.A.
abstract
full article
|
Parker A. Howell |
| 265 |
Loaded Question: Examining Loadable Kernel Modules Under the General Public License v2
abstract
full article
|
Curt Blake and Joseph Probst |
| 2 |
TrademarkDilution.com: Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp., and the Evolving Law of Trademark Dilution on the Internet
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 1 |
Broadening the Scope of Electronic Reproductions: The Interpretation of Section 201(c) in Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc.
abstract
full article
|
Shan Sivalingam |
| 3 |
Podcasting Pop Songs?: Licensing Concerns with Podcasts that contain Mainstream music
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 4 |
Patent Rights Under FOSS Licensing Schemes
abstract
full article
|
Shaobin Zhu |
| 2 |
Liability for Search Engine Triggering of Trademarked Keywords after Rescuecom
abstract
full article
|
Riana Pfefferkorn |
| 1 |
Walking from Cloud to Cloud: The Portability Issue in Cloud Computing
abstract
full article
|
Robert H. Carpenter, Jr. |
| 13 |
A Matter of Access: How Bypassing DRM Does Not Always Violate the DMCA
abstract
full article
|
Alicia Hoffer |
| 7 |
FRCP 19: A Preferable Alternative to Traditional Judicial Rules for Determining Patent Licensee Standing
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey Bashaw |
| 93 |
Neutralizing Actual Controversy: How Patent Holders Can Reduce the Risk of Declaratory Judgment in Patent Disputes
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 105 |
End User Liability for Software Developed with Trade Secrets
abstract
full article
|
Jeff Patterson |
| 135 |
Cross-Border Contributory Patent Infringement in Germany
abstract
full article
|
Prof. Dr. Heinz Goddar |
| 149 |
Copyright Infringement Liability of Placeshifting Services in the United States and Japan
abstract
full article
|
Naoya Isoda |
| 8 |
Copyright Liability for Those Who Provide the Means of Infringement: In light of the RIAA lawsuits, who is at risk for the infringing acts of others?
abstract
full article
|
Karen Horowitz |
| 14 |
The Limits of Expanding Patent Claim Scope to Provoke an Interference with a Competitor
abstract
full article
|
Christopher L. Kuyper |
| 171 |
The "Three Strikes" Policy in Korean Copyright Act 2009: Safe or Out?
abstract
full article
|
Sun-Young Moon & Daeup Kim |
| 217 |
“Capital” Punishment: Evaluating an Investor’s Secondary Copyright Infringement Liability after Veoh
abstract
full article
|
James L. Proctor, Jr. |
| 233 |
Exportability’s Effect on Process Patent Enforcement: Why § 271(f) Export Restrictions Do Not Apply to Intangible Process Claims
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 247 |
How Much is too Much? Copyright Protection of Short Portions of Text in the United States and European Union after Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades
abstract
full article
|
Connor Moran |
| 237 |
Cheaper Watches and Copyright Law: Navigating “Gray Markets” After the Supreme Court’s Split in Costco v. Omega, S.A.
abstract
full article
|
Parker A. Howell |
| 265 |
Loaded Question: Examining Loadable Kernel Modules Under the General Public License v2
abstract
full article
|
Curt Blake and Joseph Probst |
| 2 |
TrademarkDilution.com: Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp., and the Evolving Law of Trademark Dilution on the Internet
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 1 |
Broadening the Scope of Electronic Reproductions: The Interpretation of Section 201(c) in Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc.
abstract
full article
|
Shan Sivalingam |
| 3 |
Podcasting Pop Songs?: Licensing Concerns with Podcasts that contain Mainstream music
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 4 |
Patent Rights Under FOSS Licensing Schemes
abstract
full article
|
Shaobin Zhu |
| 2 |
Liability for Search Engine Triggering of Trademarked Keywords after Rescuecom
abstract
full article
|
Riana Pfefferkorn |
| 1 |
Walking from Cloud to Cloud: The Portability Issue in Cloud Computing
abstract
full article
|
Robert H. Carpenter, Jr. |
| 13 |
A Matter of Access: How Bypassing DRM Does Not Always Violate the DMCA
abstract
full article
|
Alicia Hoffer |
| 7 |
FRCP 19: A Preferable Alternative to Traditional Judicial Rules for Determining Patent Licensee Standing
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey Bashaw |
| 93 |
Neutralizing Actual Controversy: How Patent Holders Can Reduce the Risk of Declaratory Judgment in Patent Disputes
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 105 |
End User Liability for Software Developed with Trade Secrets
abstract
full article
|
Jeff Patterson |
| 135 |
Cross-Border Contributory Patent Infringement in Germany
abstract
full article
|
Prof. Dr. Heinz Goddar |
| 149 |
Copyright Infringement Liability of Placeshifting Services in the United States and Japan
abstract
full article
|
Naoya Isoda |
| 8 |
Copyright Liability for Those Who Provide the Means of Infringement: In light of the RIAA lawsuits, who is at risk for the infringing acts of others?
abstract
full article
|
Karen Horowitz |
| 14 |
The Limits of Expanding Patent Claim Scope to Provoke an Interference with a Competitor
abstract
full article
|
Christopher L. Kuyper |
| 171 |
The "Three Strikes" Policy in Korean Copyright Act 2009: Safe or Out?
abstract
full article
|
Sun-Young Moon & Daeup Kim |
| 217 |
“Capital” Punishment: Evaluating an Investor’s Secondary Copyright Infringement Liability after Veoh
abstract
full article
|
James L. Proctor, Jr. |
| 233 |
Exportability’s Effect on Process Patent Enforcement: Why § 271(f) Export Restrictions Do Not Apply to Intangible Process Claims
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 247 |
How Much is too Much? Copyright Protection of Short Portions of Text in the United States and European Union after Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades
abstract
full article
|
Connor Moran |
| 237 |
Cheaper Watches and Copyright Law: Navigating “Gray Markets” After the Supreme Court’s Split in Costco v. Omega, S.A.
abstract
full article
|
Parker A. Howell |
| 265 |
Loaded Question: Examining Loadable Kernel Modules Under the General Public License v2
abstract
full article
|
Curt Blake and Joseph Probst |
| 2 |
TrademarkDilution.com: Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp., and the Evolving Law of Trademark Dilution on the Internet
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 1 |
Broadening the Scope of Electronic Reproductions: The Interpretation of Section 201(c) in Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc.
abstract
full article
|
Shan Sivalingam |
| 3 |
Podcasting Pop Songs?: Licensing Concerns with Podcasts that contain Mainstream music
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 4 |
Patent Rights Under FOSS Licensing Schemes
abstract
full article
|
Shaobin Zhu |
| 2 |
Liability for Search Engine Triggering of Trademarked Keywords after Rescuecom
abstract
full article
|
Riana Pfefferkorn |
| 1 |
Walking from Cloud to Cloud: The Portability Issue in Cloud Computing
abstract
full article
|
Robert H. Carpenter, Jr. |
| 13 |
A Matter of Access: How Bypassing DRM Does Not Always Violate the DMCA
abstract
full article
|
Alicia Hoffer |
| 7 |
FRCP 19: A Preferable Alternative to Traditional Judicial Rules for Determining Patent Licensee Standing
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey Bashaw |
| 93 |
Neutralizing Actual Controversy: How Patent Holders Can Reduce the Risk of Declaratory Judgment in Patent Disputes
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 105 |
End User Liability for Software Developed with Trade Secrets
abstract
full article
|
Jeff Patterson |
| 135 |
Cross-Border Contributory Patent Infringement in Germany
abstract
full article
|
Prof. Dr. Heinz Goddar |
| 149 |
Copyright Infringement Liability of Placeshifting Services in the United States and Japan
abstract
full article
|
Naoya Isoda |
| 2 |
TrademarkDilution.com: Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp., and the Evolving Law of Trademark Dilution on the Internet
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 1 |
Broadening the Scope of Electronic Reproductions: The Interpretation of Section 201(c) in Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc.
abstract
full article
|
Shan Sivalingam |
| 3 |
Podcasting Pop Songs?: Licensing Concerns with Podcasts that contain Mainstream music
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 4 |
Patent Rights Under FOSS Licensing Schemes
abstract
full article
|
Shaobin Zhu |
| 2 |
Liability for Search Engine Triggering of Trademarked Keywords after Rescuecom
abstract
full article
|
Riana Pfefferkorn |
| 1 |
Walking from Cloud to Cloud: The Portability Issue in Cloud Computing
abstract
full article
|
Robert H. Carpenter, Jr. |
| 13 |
A Matter of Access: How Bypassing DRM Does Not Always Violate the DMCA
abstract
full article
|
Alicia Hoffer |
| 2 |
TrademarkDilution.com: Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp., and the Evolving Law of Trademark Dilution on the Internet
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 1 |
Broadening the Scope of Electronic Reproductions: The Interpretation of Section 201(c) in Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc.
abstract
full article
|
Shan Sivalingam |
| 3 |
Podcasting Pop Songs?: Licensing Concerns with Podcasts that contain Mainstream music
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 4 |
Patent Rights Under FOSS Licensing Schemes
abstract
full article
|
Shaobin Zhu |
| 2 |
Liability for Search Engine Triggering of Trademarked Keywords after Rescuecom
abstract
full article
|
Riana Pfefferkorn |
| 1 |
Walking from Cloud to Cloud: The Portability Issue in Cloud Computing
abstract
full article
|
Robert H. Carpenter, Jr. |
| 13 |
A Matter of Access: How Bypassing DRM Does Not Always Violate the DMCA
abstract
full article
|
Alicia Hoffer |
| 7 |
FRCP 19: A Preferable Alternative to Traditional Judicial Rules for Determining Patent Licensee Standing
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey Bashaw |
| 93 |
Neutralizing Actual Controversy: How Patent Holders Can Reduce the Risk of Declaratory Judgment in Patent Disputes
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 105 |
End User Liability for Software Developed with Trade Secrets
abstract
full article
|
Jeff Patterson |
| 135 |
Cross-Border Contributory Patent Infringement in Germany
abstract
full article
|
Prof. Dr. Heinz Goddar |
| 149 |
Copyright Infringement Liability of Placeshifting Services in the United States and Japan
abstract
full article
|
Naoya Isoda |
| 2 |
TrademarkDilution.com: Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp., and the Evolving Law of Trademark Dilution on the Internet
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 1 |
Broadening the Scope of Electronic Reproductions: The Interpretation of Section 201(c) in Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc.
abstract
full article
|
Shan Sivalingam |
| 3 |
Podcasting Pop Songs?: Licensing Concerns with Podcasts that contain Mainstream music
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 4 |
Patent Rights Under FOSS Licensing Schemes
abstract
full article
|
Shaobin Zhu |
| 2 |
Liability for Search Engine Triggering of Trademarked Keywords after Rescuecom
abstract
full article
|
Riana Pfefferkorn |
| 1 |
Walking from Cloud to Cloud: The Portability Issue in Cloud Computing
abstract
full article
|
Robert H. Carpenter, Jr. |
| 13 |
A Matter of Access: How Bypassing DRM Does Not Always Violate the DMCA
abstract
full article
|
Alicia Hoffer |
| 2 |
TrademarkDilution.com: Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp., and the Evolving Law of Trademark Dilution on the Internet
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 1 |
Broadening the Scope of Electronic Reproductions: The Interpretation of Section 201(c) in Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc.
abstract
full article
|
Shan Sivalingam |
| 3 |
Podcasting Pop Songs?: Licensing Concerns with Podcasts that contain Mainstream music
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 4 |
Patent Rights Under FOSS Licensing Schemes
abstract
full article
|
Shaobin Zhu |
| 2 |
Liability for Search Engine Triggering of Trademarked Keywords after Rescuecom
abstract
full article
|
Riana Pfefferkorn |
| 1 |
Walking from Cloud to Cloud: The Portability Issue in Cloud Computing
abstract
full article
|
Robert H. Carpenter, Jr. |
| 13 |
A Matter of Access: How Bypassing DRM Does Not Always Violate the DMCA
abstract
full article
|
Alicia Hoffer |
| 7 |
FRCP 19: A Preferable Alternative to Traditional Judicial Rules for Determining Patent Licensee Standing
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey Bashaw |
| 93 |
Neutralizing Actual Controversy: How Patent Holders Can Reduce the Risk of Declaratory Judgment in Patent Disputes
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 105 |
End User Liability for Software Developed with Trade Secrets
abstract
full article
|
Jeff Patterson |
| 135 |
Cross-Border Contributory Patent Infringement in Germany
abstract
full article
|
Prof. Dr. Heinz Goddar |
| 149 |
Copyright Infringement Liability of Placeshifting Services in the United States and Japan
abstract
full article
|
Naoya Isoda |
| 8 |
Copyright Liability for Those Who Provide the Means of Infringement: In light of the RIAA lawsuits, who is at risk for the infringing acts of others?
abstract
full article
|
Karen Horowitz |
| 14 |
The Limits of Expanding Patent Claim Scope to Provoke an Interference with a Competitor
abstract
full article
|
Christopher L. Kuyper |
| 171 |
The "Three Strikes" Policy in Korean Copyright Act 2009: Safe or Out?
abstract
full article
|
Sun-Young Moon & Daeup Kim |
| 217 |
“Capital” Punishment: Evaluating an Investor’s Secondary Copyright Infringement Liability after Veoh
abstract
full article
|
James L. Proctor, Jr. |
| 233 |
Exportability’s Effect on Process Patent Enforcement: Why § 271(f) Export Restrictions Do Not Apply to Intangible Process Claims
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 247 |
How Much is too Much? Copyright Protection of Short Portions of Text in the United States and European Union after Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades
abstract
full article
|
Connor Moran |
| 237 |
Cheaper Watches and Copyright Law: Navigating “Gray Markets” After the Supreme Court’s Split in Costco v. Omega, S.A.
abstract
full article
|
Parker A. Howell |
| 265 |
Loaded Question: Examining Loadable Kernel Modules Under the General Public License v2
abstract
full article
|
Curt Blake and Joseph Probst |
| 2 |
TrademarkDilution.com: Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp., and the Evolving Law of Trademark Dilution on the Internet
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 1 |
Broadening the Scope of Electronic Reproductions: The Interpretation of Section 201(c) in Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc.
abstract
full article
|
Shan Sivalingam |
| 3 |
Podcasting Pop Songs?: Licensing Concerns with Podcasts that contain Mainstream music
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 4 |
Patent Rights Under FOSS Licensing Schemes
abstract
full article
|
Shaobin Zhu |
| 2 |
Liability for Search Engine Triggering of Trademarked Keywords after Rescuecom
abstract
full article
|
Riana Pfefferkorn |
| 1 |
Walking from Cloud to Cloud: The Portability Issue in Cloud Computing
abstract
full article
|
Robert H. Carpenter, Jr. |
| 13 |
A Matter of Access: How Bypassing DRM Does Not Always Violate the DMCA
abstract
full article
|
Alicia Hoffer |
| 7 |
FRCP 19: A Preferable Alternative to Traditional Judicial Rules for Determining Patent Licensee Standing
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey Bashaw |
| 93 |
Neutralizing Actual Controversy: How Patent Holders Can Reduce the Risk of Declaratory Judgment in Patent Disputes
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 105 |
End User Liability for Software Developed with Trade Secrets
abstract
full article
|
Jeff Patterson |
| 135 |
Cross-Border Contributory Patent Infringement in Germany
abstract
full article
|
Prof. Dr. Heinz Goddar |
| 149 |
Copyright Infringement Liability of Placeshifting Services in the United States and Japan
abstract
full article
|
Naoya Isoda |
| 8 |
Copyright Liability for Those Who Provide the Means of Infringement: In light of the RIAA lawsuits, who is at risk for the infringing acts of others?
abstract
full article
|
Karen Horowitz |
| 14 |
The Limits of Expanding Patent Claim Scope to Provoke an Interference with a Competitor
abstract
full article
|
Christopher L. Kuyper |
| 171 |
The "Three Strikes" Policy in Korean Copyright Act 2009: Safe or Out?
abstract
full article
|
Sun-Young Moon & Daeup Kim |
| 217 |
“Capital” Punishment: Evaluating an Investor’s Secondary Copyright Infringement Liability after Veoh
abstract
full article
|
James L. Proctor, Jr. |
| 233 |
Exportability’s Effect on Process Patent Enforcement: Why § 271(f) Export Restrictions Do Not Apply to Intangible Process Claims
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 247 |
How Much is too Much? Copyright Protection of Short Portions of Text in the United States and European Union after Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades
abstract
full article
|
Connor Moran |
| 237 |
Cheaper Watches and Copyright Law: Navigating “Gray Markets” After the Supreme Court’s Split in Costco v. Omega, S.A.
abstract
full article
|
Parker A. Howell |
| 265 |
Loaded Question: Examining Loadable Kernel Modules Under the General Public License v2
abstract
full article
|
Curt Blake and Joseph Probst |
| 15 |
Easy Come, Easy Go: Copyright Infringement and the DMCA's Notice and Takedown Provision in Light of Rossi v. MPAA
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 16 |
The Failures and Promises of Canada’s Alternative Compensation System for Private Reproduction of Copyrighted Recordings
abstract
full article
|
Evgenia Fkiaras |
| 15 |
Cases in Wake of Dastar v. Twentieth Century Fox Continue to Narrow the Scope of a "Reverse Passing Off" Claim
In 2003, the United States Supreme Court decided Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp, narrowing the scope of protection under the federal Lanham Act for “reverse passing off.” “Reverse passing off” is derived from the statutory language in § 43(a) of the Lanham Act prohibiting a “false designation of origin” that is likely to cause consumer confusion and generally occurs where one company puts forth another company’s product as its own. A “reverse passing off” claim was also thought to be feasible against one who misrepresented the source of the creative or communicative work embodied in a product. In Dastar, however, the Court limited the ability to bring a claim of “reverse passing off” by narrowly defining the term “origin,” holding that “origin” refers only to the source of the tangible goods and not to the source of any idea, concept or communication embodied in the tangible goods. Following Dastar, several cases have further defined the scope of a “reverse passing off” claim. This Article introduces the concept of “reverse passing off” and then discusses the impact of Dastar and its application in subsequent cases.
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 259 |
Choose Your Words Wisely: Affirmative Representations as a Limit on § 230 Immunity
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey R. Doty |
| 297 |
A Survey of the DMCA’s Copyright Management Information Protections: The DMCA’s CMI Landscape After All Headline News and McClatchey
abstract
full article
|
Susuk Lim |
| 311 |
Jacobson Revisited: Conditions, Covenants and the Future of Open-Source Software Licenses
abstract
full article
|
Yamini Menon |
| 2 |
TrademarkDilution.com: Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp., and the Evolving Law of Trademark Dilution on the Internet
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 1 |
Broadening the Scope of Electronic Reproductions: The Interpretation of Section 201(c) in Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc.
abstract
full article
|
Shan Sivalingam |
| 3 |
Podcasting Pop Songs?: Licensing Concerns with Podcasts that contain Mainstream music
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 4 |
Patent Rights Under FOSS Licensing Schemes
abstract
full article
|
Shaobin Zhu |
| 2 |
Liability for Search Engine Triggering of Trademarked Keywords after Rescuecom
abstract
full article
|
Riana Pfefferkorn |
| 1 |
Walking from Cloud to Cloud: The Portability Issue in Cloud Computing
abstract
full article
|
Robert H. Carpenter, Jr. |
| 13 |
A Matter of Access: How Bypassing DRM Does Not Always Violate the DMCA
abstract
full article
|
Alicia Hoffer |
| 7 |
FRCP 19: A Preferable Alternative to Traditional Judicial Rules for Determining Patent Licensee Standing
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey Bashaw |
| 93 |
Neutralizing Actual Controversy: How Patent Holders Can Reduce the Risk of Declaratory Judgment in Patent Disputes
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 105 |
End User Liability for Software Developed with Trade Secrets
abstract
full article
|
Jeff Patterson |
| 135 |
Cross-Border Contributory Patent Infringement in Germany
abstract
full article
|
Prof. Dr. Heinz Goddar |
| 149 |
Copyright Infringement Liability of Placeshifting Services in the United States and Japan
abstract
full article
|
Naoya Isoda |
| 8 |
Copyright Liability for Those Who Provide the Means of Infringement: In light of the RIAA lawsuits, who is at risk for the infringing acts of others?
abstract
full article
|
Karen Horowitz |
| 14 |
The Limits of Expanding Patent Claim Scope to Provoke an Interference with a Competitor
abstract
full article
|
Christopher L. Kuyper |
| 171 |
The "Three Strikes" Policy in Korean Copyright Act 2009: Safe or Out?
abstract
full article
|
Sun-Young Moon & Daeup Kim |
| 217 |
“Capital” Punishment: Evaluating an Investor’s Secondary Copyright Infringement Liability after Veoh
abstract
full article
|
James L. Proctor, Jr. |
| 233 |
Exportability’s Effect on Process Patent Enforcement: Why § 271(f) Export Restrictions Do Not Apply to Intangible Process Claims
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 247 |
How Much is too Much? Copyright Protection of Short Portions of Text in the United States and European Union after Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades
abstract
full article
|
Connor Moran |
| 237 |
Cheaper Watches and Copyright Law: Navigating “Gray Markets” After the Supreme Court’s Split in Costco v. Omega, S.A.
abstract
full article
|
Parker A. Howell |
| 265 |
Loaded Question: Examining Loadable Kernel Modules Under the General Public License v2
abstract
full article
|
Curt Blake and Joseph Probst |
| 15 |
Easy Come, Easy Go: Copyright Infringement and the DMCA's Notice and Takedown Provision in Light of Rossi v. MPAA
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 16 |
The Failures and Promises of Canada’s Alternative Compensation System for Private Reproduction of Copyrighted Recordings
abstract
full article
|
Evgenia Fkiaras |
| 15 |
Cases in Wake of Dastar v. Twentieth Century Fox Continue to Narrow the Scope of a "Reverse Passing Off" Claim
In 2003, the United States Supreme Court decided Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp, narrowing the scope of protection under the federal Lanham Act for “reverse passing off.” “Reverse passing off” is derived from the statutory language in § 43(a) of the Lanham Act prohibiting a “false designation of origin” that is likely to cause consumer confusion and generally occurs where one company puts forth another company’s product as its own. A “reverse passing off” claim was also thought to be feasible against one who misrepresented the source of the creative or communicative work embodied in a product. In Dastar, however, the Court limited the ability to bring a claim of “reverse passing off” by narrowly defining the term “origin,” holding that “origin” refers only to the source of the tangible goods and not to the source of any idea, concept or communication embodied in the tangible goods. Following Dastar, several cases have further defined the scope of a “reverse passing off” claim. This Article introduces the concept of “reverse passing off” and then discusses the impact of Dastar and its application in subsequent cases.
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 259 |
Choose Your Words Wisely: Affirmative Representations as a Limit on § 230 Immunity
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey R. Doty |
| 297 |
A Survey of the DMCA’s Copyright Management Information Protections: The DMCA’s CMI Landscape After All Headline News and McClatchey
abstract
full article
|
Susuk Lim |
| 311 |
Jacobson Revisited: Conditions, Covenants and the Future of Open-Source Software Licenses
abstract
full article
|
Yamini Menon |
| 2 |
TrademarkDilution.com: Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp., and the Evolving Law of Trademark Dilution on the Internet
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 1 |
Broadening the Scope of Electronic Reproductions: The Interpretation of Section 201(c) in Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc.
abstract
full article
|
Shan Sivalingam |
| 3 |
Podcasting Pop Songs?: Licensing Concerns with Podcasts that contain Mainstream music
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 4 |
Patent Rights Under FOSS Licensing Schemes
abstract
full article
|
Shaobin Zhu |
| 2 |
Liability for Search Engine Triggering of Trademarked Keywords after Rescuecom
abstract
full article
|
Riana Pfefferkorn |
| 1 |
Walking from Cloud to Cloud: The Portability Issue in Cloud Computing
abstract
full article
|
Robert H. Carpenter, Jr. |
| 13 |
A Matter of Access: How Bypassing DRM Does Not Always Violate the DMCA
abstract
full article
|
Alicia Hoffer |
| 7 |
FRCP 19: A Preferable Alternative to Traditional Judicial Rules for Determining Patent Licensee Standing
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey Bashaw |
| 93 |
Neutralizing Actual Controversy: How Patent Holders Can Reduce the Risk of Declaratory Judgment in Patent Disputes
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 105 |
End User Liability for Software Developed with Trade Secrets
abstract
full article
|
Jeff Patterson |
| 135 |
Cross-Border Contributory Patent Infringement in Germany
abstract
full article
|
Prof. Dr. Heinz Goddar |
| 149 |
Copyright Infringement Liability of Placeshifting Services in the United States and Japan
abstract
full article
|
Naoya Isoda |
| 8 |
Copyright Liability for Those Who Provide the Means of Infringement: In light of the RIAA lawsuits, who is at risk for the infringing acts of others?
abstract
full article
|
Karen Horowitz |
| 14 |
The Limits of Expanding Patent Claim Scope to Provoke an Interference with a Competitor
abstract
full article
|
Christopher L. Kuyper |
| 171 |
The "Three Strikes" Policy in Korean Copyright Act 2009: Safe or Out?
abstract
full article
|
Sun-Young Moon & Daeup Kim |
| 217 |
“Capital” Punishment: Evaluating an Investor’s Secondary Copyright Infringement Liability after Veoh
abstract
full article
|
James L. Proctor, Jr. |
| 233 |
Exportability’s Effect on Process Patent Enforcement: Why § 271(f) Export Restrictions Do Not Apply to Intangible Process Claims
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 247 |
How Much is too Much? Copyright Protection of Short Portions of Text in the United States and European Union after Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades
abstract
full article
|
Connor Moran |
| 237 |
Cheaper Watches and Copyright Law: Navigating “Gray Markets” After the Supreme Court’s Split in Costco v. Omega, S.A.
abstract
full article
|
Parker A. Howell |
| 265 |
Loaded Question: Examining Loadable Kernel Modules Under the General Public License v2
abstract
full article
|
Curt Blake and Joseph Probst |
| 15 |
Easy Come, Easy Go: Copyright Infringement and the DMCA's Notice and Takedown Provision in Light of Rossi v. MPAA
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 16 |
The Failures and Promises of Canada’s Alternative Compensation System for Private Reproduction of Copyrighted Recordings
abstract
full article
|
Evgenia Fkiaras |
| 15 |
Cases in Wake of Dastar v. Twentieth Century Fox Continue to Narrow the Scope of a "Reverse Passing Off" Claim
In 2003, the United States Supreme Court decided Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp, narrowing the scope of protection under the federal Lanham Act for “reverse passing off.” “Reverse passing off” is derived from the statutory language in § 43(a) of the Lanham Act prohibiting a “false designation of origin” that is likely to cause consumer confusion and generally occurs where one company puts forth another company’s product as its own. A “reverse passing off” claim was also thought to be feasible against one who misrepresented the source of the creative or communicative work embodied in a product. In Dastar, however, the Court limited the ability to bring a claim of “reverse passing off” by narrowly defining the term “origin,” holding that “origin” refers only to the source of the tangible goods and not to the source of any idea, concept or communication embodied in the tangible goods. Following Dastar, several cases have further defined the scope of a “reverse passing off” claim. This Article introduces the concept of “reverse passing off” and then discusses the impact of Dastar and its application in subsequent cases.
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 259 |
Choose Your Words Wisely: Affirmative Representations as a Limit on § 230 Immunity
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey R. Doty |
| 297 |
A Survey of the DMCA’s Copyright Management Information Protections: The DMCA’s CMI Landscape After All Headline News and McClatchey
abstract
full article
|
Susuk Lim |
| 311 |
Jacobson Revisited: Conditions, Covenants and the Future of Open-Source Software Licenses
abstract
full article
|
Yamini Menon |
| 2 |
TrademarkDilution.com: Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp., and the Evolving Law of Trademark Dilution on the Internet
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 1 |
Broadening the Scope of Electronic Reproductions: The Interpretation of Section 201(c) in Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc.
abstract
full article
|
Shan Sivalingam |
| 3 |
Podcasting Pop Songs?: Licensing Concerns with Podcasts that contain Mainstream music
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 4 |
Patent Rights Under FOSS Licensing Schemes
abstract
full article
|
Shaobin Zhu |
| 2 |
Liability for Search Engine Triggering of Trademarked Keywords after Rescuecom
abstract
full article
|
Riana Pfefferkorn |
| 1 |
Walking from Cloud to Cloud: The Portability Issue in Cloud Computing
abstract
full article
|
Robert H. Carpenter, Jr. |
| 13 |
A Matter of Access: How Bypassing DRM Does Not Always Violate the DMCA
abstract
full article
|
Alicia Hoffer |
| 7 |
FRCP 19: A Preferable Alternative to Traditional Judicial Rules for Determining Patent Licensee Standing
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey Bashaw |
| 93 |
Neutralizing Actual Controversy: How Patent Holders Can Reduce the Risk of Declaratory Judgment in Patent Disputes
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 105 |
End User Liability for Software Developed with Trade Secrets
abstract
full article
|
Jeff Patterson |
| 135 |
Cross-Border Contributory Patent Infringement in Germany
abstract
full article
|
Prof. Dr. Heinz Goddar |
| 149 |
Copyright Infringement Liability of Placeshifting Services in the United States and Japan
abstract
full article
|
Naoya Isoda |
| 8 |
Copyright Liability for Those Who Provide the Means of Infringement: In light of the RIAA lawsuits, who is at risk for the infringing acts of others?
abstract
full article
|
Karen Horowitz |
| 14 |
The Limits of Expanding Patent Claim Scope to Provoke an Interference with a Competitor
abstract
full article
|
Christopher L. Kuyper |
| 171 |
The "Three Strikes" Policy in Korean Copyright Act 2009: Safe or Out?
abstract
full article
|
Sun-Young Moon & Daeup Kim |
| 217 |
“Capital” Punishment: Evaluating an Investor’s Secondary Copyright Infringement Liability after Veoh
abstract
full article
|
James L. Proctor, Jr. |
| 233 |
Exportability’s Effect on Process Patent Enforcement: Why § 271(f) Export Restrictions Do Not Apply to Intangible Process Claims
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 247 |
How Much is too Much? Copyright Protection of Short Portions of Text in the United States and European Union after Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades
abstract
full article
|
Connor Moran |
| 237 |
Cheaper Watches and Copyright Law: Navigating “Gray Markets” After the Supreme Court’s Split in Costco v. Omega, S.A.
abstract
full article
|
Parker A. Howell |
| 265 |
Loaded Question: Examining Loadable Kernel Modules Under the General Public License v2
abstract
full article
|
Curt Blake and Joseph Probst |
| 15 |
Easy Come, Easy Go: Copyright Infringement and the DMCA's Notice and Takedown Provision in Light of Rossi v. MPAA
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 16 |
The Failures and Promises of Canada’s Alternative Compensation System for Private Reproduction of Copyrighted Recordings
abstract
full article
|
Evgenia Fkiaras |
| 15 |
Cases in Wake of Dastar v. Twentieth Century Fox Continue to Narrow the Scope of a "Reverse Passing Off" Claim
In 2003, the United States Supreme Court decided Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp, narrowing the scope of protection under the federal Lanham Act for “reverse passing off.” “Reverse passing off” is derived from the statutory language in § 43(a) of the Lanham Act prohibiting a “false designation of origin” that is likely to cause consumer confusion and generally occurs where one company puts forth another company’s product as its own. A “reverse passing off” claim was also thought to be feasible against one who misrepresented the source of the creative or communicative work embodied in a product. In Dastar, however, the Court limited the ability to bring a claim of “reverse passing off” by narrowly defining the term “origin,” holding that “origin” refers only to the source of the tangible goods and not to the source of any idea, concept or communication embodied in the tangible goods. Following Dastar, several cases have further defined the scope of a “reverse passing off” claim. This Article introduces the concept of “reverse passing off” and then discusses the impact of Dastar and its application in subsequent cases.
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 259 |
Choose Your Words Wisely: Affirmative Representations as a Limit on § 230 Immunity
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey R. Doty |
| 297 |
A Survey of the DMCA’s Copyright Management Information Protections: The DMCA’s CMI Landscape After All Headline News and McClatchey
abstract
full article
|
Susuk Lim |
| 311 |
Jacobson Revisited: Conditions, Covenants and the Future of Open-Source Software Licenses
abstract
full article
|
Yamini Menon |
| 24 |
Intellectual Property Protection for Fashion Design: An Overview of Existing Law and A Look Toward Proposed Legislative Changes
abstract
full article
|
Elizabeth Mills |
| 2 |
TrademarkDilution.com: Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp., and the Evolving Law of Trademark Dilution on the Internet
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 1 |
Broadening the Scope of Electronic Reproductions: The Interpretation of Section 201(c) in Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc.
abstract
full article
|
Shan Sivalingam |
| 3 |
Podcasting Pop Songs?: Licensing Concerns with Podcasts that contain Mainstream music
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 4 |
Patent Rights Under FOSS Licensing Schemes
abstract
full article
|
Shaobin Zhu |
| 2 |
Liability for Search Engine Triggering of Trademarked Keywords after Rescuecom
abstract
full article
|
Riana Pfefferkorn |
| 1 |
Walking from Cloud to Cloud: The Portability Issue in Cloud Computing
abstract
full article
|
Robert H. Carpenter, Jr. |
| 13 |
A Matter of Access: How Bypassing DRM Does Not Always Violate the DMCA
abstract
full article
|
Alicia Hoffer |
| 7 |
FRCP 19: A Preferable Alternative to Traditional Judicial Rules for Determining Patent Licensee Standing
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey Bashaw |
| 93 |
Neutralizing Actual Controversy: How Patent Holders Can Reduce the Risk of Declaratory Judgment in Patent Disputes
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 105 |
End User Liability for Software Developed with Trade Secrets
abstract
full article
|
Jeff Patterson |
| 135 |
Cross-Border Contributory Patent Infringement in Germany
abstract
full article
|
Prof. Dr. Heinz Goddar |
| 149 |
Copyright Infringement Liability of Placeshifting Services in the United States and Japan
abstract
full article
|
Naoya Isoda |
| 8 |
Copyright Liability for Those Who Provide the Means of Infringement: In light of the RIAA lawsuits, who is at risk for the infringing acts of others?
abstract
full article
|
Karen Horowitz |
| 14 |
The Limits of Expanding Patent Claim Scope to Provoke an Interference with a Competitor
abstract
full article
|
Christopher L. Kuyper |
| 171 |
The "Three Strikes" Policy in Korean Copyright Act 2009: Safe or Out?
abstract
full article
|
Sun-Young Moon & Daeup Kim |
| 217 |
“Capital” Punishment: Evaluating an Investor’s Secondary Copyright Infringement Liability after Veoh
abstract
full article
|
James L. Proctor, Jr. |
| 233 |
Exportability’s Effect on Process Patent Enforcement: Why § 271(f) Export Restrictions Do Not Apply to Intangible Process Claims
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 247 |
How Much is too Much? Copyright Protection of Short Portions of Text in the United States and European Union after Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades
abstract
full article
|
Connor Moran |
| 237 |
Cheaper Watches and Copyright Law: Navigating “Gray Markets” After the Supreme Court’s Split in Costco v. Omega, S.A.
abstract
full article
|
Parker A. Howell |
| 265 |
Loaded Question: Examining Loadable Kernel Modules Under the General Public License v2
abstract
full article
|
Curt Blake and Joseph Probst |
| 15 |
Easy Come, Easy Go: Copyright Infringement and the DMCA's Notice and Takedown Provision in Light of Rossi v. MPAA
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 16 |
The Failures and Promises of Canada’s Alternative Compensation System for Private Reproduction of Copyrighted Recordings
abstract
full article
|
Evgenia Fkiaras |
| 15 |
Cases in Wake of Dastar v. Twentieth Century Fox Continue to Narrow the Scope of a "Reverse Passing Off" Claim
In 2003, the United States Supreme Court decided Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp, narrowing the scope of protection under the federal Lanham Act for “reverse passing off.” “Reverse passing off” is derived from the statutory language in § 43(a) of the Lanham Act prohibiting a “false designation of origin” that is likely to cause consumer confusion and generally occurs where one company puts forth another company’s product as its own. A “reverse passing off” claim was also thought to be feasible against one who misrepresented the source of the creative or communicative work embodied in a product. In Dastar, however, the Court limited the ability to bring a claim of “reverse passing off” by narrowly defining the term “origin,” holding that “origin” refers only to the source of the tangible goods and not to the source of any idea, concept or communication embodied in the tangible goods. Following Dastar, several cases have further defined the scope of a “reverse passing off” claim. This Article introduces the concept of “reverse passing off” and then discusses the impact of Dastar and its application in subsequent cases.
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 259 |
Choose Your Words Wisely: Affirmative Representations as a Limit on § 230 Immunity
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey R. Doty |
| 297 |
A Survey of the DMCA’s Copyright Management Information Protections: The DMCA’s CMI Landscape After All Headline News and McClatchey
abstract
full article
|
Susuk Lim |
| 311 |
Jacobson Revisited: Conditions, Covenants and the Future of Open-Source Software Licenses
abstract
full article
|
Yamini Menon |
| 2 |
TrademarkDilution.com: Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp., and the Evolving Law of Trademark Dilution on the Internet
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 1 |
Broadening the Scope of Electronic Reproductions: The Interpretation of Section 201(c) in Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc.
abstract
full article
|
Shan Sivalingam |
| 3 |
Podcasting Pop Songs?: Licensing Concerns with Podcasts that contain Mainstream music
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 4 |
Patent Rights Under FOSS Licensing Schemes
abstract
full article
|
Shaobin Zhu |
| 2 |
Liability for Search Engine Triggering of Trademarked Keywords after Rescuecom
abstract
full article
|
Riana Pfefferkorn |
| 1 |
Walking from Cloud to Cloud: The Portability Issue in Cloud Computing
abstract
full article
|
Robert H. Carpenter, Jr. |
| 13 |
A Matter of Access: How Bypassing DRM Does Not Always Violate the DMCA
abstract
full article
|
Alicia Hoffer |
| 7 |
FRCP 19: A Preferable Alternative to Traditional Judicial Rules for Determining Patent Licensee Standing
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey Bashaw |
| 93 |
Neutralizing Actual Controversy: How Patent Holders Can Reduce the Risk of Declaratory Judgment in Patent Disputes
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 105 |
End User Liability for Software Developed with Trade Secrets
abstract
full article
|
Jeff Patterson |
| 135 |
Cross-Border Contributory Patent Infringement in Germany
abstract
full article
|
Prof. Dr. Heinz Goddar |
| 149 |
Copyright Infringement Liability of Placeshifting Services in the United States and Japan
abstract
full article
|
Naoya Isoda |
| 8 |
Copyright Liability for Those Who Provide the Means of Infringement: In light of the RIAA lawsuits, who is at risk for the infringing acts of others?
abstract
full article
|
Karen Horowitz |
| 14 |
The Limits of Expanding Patent Claim Scope to Provoke an Interference with a Competitor
abstract
full article
|
Christopher L. Kuyper |
| 171 |
The "Three Strikes" Policy in Korean Copyright Act 2009: Safe or Out?
abstract
full article
|
Sun-Young Moon & Daeup Kim |
| 217 |
“Capital” Punishment: Evaluating an Investor’s Secondary Copyright Infringement Liability after Veoh
abstract
full article
|
James L. Proctor, Jr. |
| 233 |
Exportability’s Effect on Process Patent Enforcement: Why § 271(f) Export Restrictions Do Not Apply to Intangible Process Claims
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 247 |
How Much is too Much? Copyright Protection of Short Portions of Text in the United States and European Union after Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades
abstract
full article
|
Connor Moran |
| 237 |
Cheaper Watches and Copyright Law: Navigating “Gray Markets” After the Supreme Court’s Split in Costco v. Omega, S.A.
abstract
full article
|
Parker A. Howell |
| 265 |
Loaded Question: Examining Loadable Kernel Modules Under the General Public License v2
abstract
full article
|
Curt Blake and Joseph Probst |
| 2 |
TrademarkDilution.com: Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp., and the Evolving Law of Trademark Dilution on the Internet
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 1 |
Broadening the Scope of Electronic Reproductions: The Interpretation of Section 201(c) in Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc.
abstract
full article
|
Shan Sivalingam |
| 3 |
Podcasting Pop Songs?: Licensing Concerns with Podcasts that contain Mainstream music
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 4 |
Patent Rights Under FOSS Licensing Schemes
abstract
full article
|
Shaobin Zhu |
| 2 |
Liability for Search Engine Triggering of Trademarked Keywords after Rescuecom
abstract
full article
|
Riana Pfefferkorn |
| 1 |
Walking from Cloud to Cloud: The Portability Issue in Cloud Computing
abstract
full article
|
Robert H. Carpenter, Jr. |
| 13 |
A Matter of Access: How Bypassing DRM Does Not Always Violate the DMCA
abstract
full article
|
Alicia Hoffer |
| 7 |
FRCP 19: A Preferable Alternative to Traditional Judicial Rules for Determining Patent Licensee Standing
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey Bashaw |
| 93 |
Neutralizing Actual Controversy: How Patent Holders Can Reduce the Risk of Declaratory Judgment in Patent Disputes
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 105 |
End User Liability for Software Developed with Trade Secrets
abstract
full article
|
Jeff Patterson |
| 135 |
Cross-Border Contributory Patent Infringement in Germany
abstract
full article
|
Prof. Dr. Heinz Goddar |
| 149 |
Copyright Infringement Liability of Placeshifting Services in the United States and Japan
abstract
full article
|
Naoya Isoda |
| 8 |
Copyright Liability for Those Who Provide the Means of Infringement: In light of the RIAA lawsuits, who is at risk for the infringing acts of others?
abstract
full article
|
Karen Horowitz |
| 14 |
The Limits of Expanding Patent Claim Scope to Provoke an Interference with a Competitor
abstract
full article
|
Christopher L. Kuyper |
| 171 |
The "Three Strikes" Policy in Korean Copyright Act 2009: Safe or Out?
abstract
full article
|
Sun-Young Moon & Daeup Kim |
| 217 |
“Capital” Punishment: Evaluating an Investor’s Secondary Copyright Infringement Liability after Veoh
abstract
full article
|
James L. Proctor, Jr. |
| 233 |
Exportability’s Effect on Process Patent Enforcement: Why § 271(f) Export Restrictions Do Not Apply to Intangible Process Claims
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 247 |
How Much is too Much? Copyright Protection of Short Portions of Text in the United States and European Union after Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades
abstract
full article
|
Connor Moran |
| 237 |
Cheaper Watches and Copyright Law: Navigating “Gray Markets” After the Supreme Court’s Split in Costco v. Omega, S.A.
abstract
full article
|
Parker A. Howell |
| 265 |
Loaded Question: Examining Loadable Kernel Modules Under the General Public License v2
abstract
full article
|
Curt Blake and Joseph Probst |
| 15 |
Easy Come, Easy Go: Copyright Infringement and the DMCA's Notice and Takedown Provision in Light of Rossi v. MPAA
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 16 |
The Failures and Promises of Canada’s Alternative Compensation System for Private Reproduction of Copyrighted Recordings
abstract
full article
|
Evgenia Fkiaras |
| 15 |
Cases in Wake of Dastar v. Twentieth Century Fox Continue to Narrow the Scope of a "Reverse Passing Off" Claim
In 2003, the United States Supreme Court decided Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp, narrowing the scope of protection under the federal Lanham Act for “reverse passing off.” “Reverse passing off” is derived from the statutory language in § 43(a) of the Lanham Act prohibiting a “false designation of origin” that is likely to cause consumer confusion and generally occurs where one company puts forth another company’s product as its own. A “reverse passing off” claim was also thought to be feasible against one who misrepresented the source of the creative or communicative work embodied in a product. In Dastar, however, the Court limited the ability to bring a claim of “reverse passing off” by narrowly defining the term “origin,” holding that “origin” refers only to the source of the tangible goods and not to the source of any idea, concept or communication embodied in the tangible goods. Following Dastar, several cases have further defined the scope of a “reverse passing off” claim. This Article introduces the concept of “reverse passing off” and then discusses the impact of Dastar and its application in subsequent cases.
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 259 |
Choose Your Words Wisely: Affirmative Representations as a Limit on § 230 Immunity
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey R. Doty |
| 297 |
A Survey of the DMCA’s Copyright Management Information Protections: The DMCA’s CMI Landscape After All Headline News and McClatchey
abstract
full article
|
Susuk Lim |
| 311 |
Jacobson Revisited: Conditions, Covenants and the Future of Open-Source Software Licenses
abstract
full article
|
Yamini Menon |
| 2 |
TrademarkDilution.com: Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp., and the Evolving Law of Trademark Dilution on the Internet
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 1 |
Broadening the Scope of Electronic Reproductions: The Interpretation of Section 201(c) in Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc.
abstract
full article
|
Shan Sivalingam |
| 3 |
Podcasting Pop Songs?: Licensing Concerns with Podcasts that contain Mainstream music
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 4 |
Patent Rights Under FOSS Licensing Schemes
abstract
full article
|
Shaobin Zhu |
| 2 |
Liability for Search Engine Triggering of Trademarked Keywords after Rescuecom
abstract
full article
|
Riana Pfefferkorn |
| 1 |
Walking from Cloud to Cloud: The Portability Issue in Cloud Computing
abstract
full article
|
Robert H. Carpenter, Jr. |
| 13 |
A Matter of Access: How Bypassing DRM Does Not Always Violate the DMCA
abstract
full article
|
Alicia Hoffer |
| 7 |
FRCP 19: A Preferable Alternative to Traditional Judicial Rules for Determining Patent Licensee Standing
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey Bashaw |
| 93 |
Neutralizing Actual Controversy: How Patent Holders Can Reduce the Risk of Declaratory Judgment in Patent Disputes
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 105 |
End User Liability for Software Developed with Trade Secrets
abstract
full article
|
Jeff Patterson |
| 135 |
Cross-Border Contributory Patent Infringement in Germany
abstract
full article
|
Prof. Dr. Heinz Goddar |
| 149 |
Copyright Infringement Liability of Placeshifting Services in the United States and Japan
abstract
full article
|
Naoya Isoda |
| 8 |
Copyright Liability for Those Who Provide the Means of Infringement: In light of the RIAA lawsuits, who is at risk for the infringing acts of others?
abstract
full article
|
Karen Horowitz |
| 14 |
The Limits of Expanding Patent Claim Scope to Provoke an Interference with a Competitor
abstract
full article
|
Christopher L. Kuyper |
| 171 |
The "Three Strikes" Policy in Korean Copyright Act 2009: Safe or Out?
abstract
full article
|
Sun-Young Moon & Daeup Kim |
| 217 |
“Capital” Punishment: Evaluating an Investor’s Secondary Copyright Infringement Liability after Veoh
abstract
full article
|
James L. Proctor, Jr. |
| 233 |
Exportability’s Effect on Process Patent Enforcement: Why § 271(f) Export Restrictions Do Not Apply to Intangible Process Claims
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 247 |
How Much is too Much? Copyright Protection of Short Portions of Text in the United States and European Union after Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades
abstract
full article
|
Connor Moran |
| 237 |
Cheaper Watches and Copyright Law: Navigating “Gray Markets” After the Supreme Court’s Split in Costco v. Omega, S.A.
abstract
full article
|
Parker A. Howell |
| 265 |
Loaded Question: Examining Loadable Kernel Modules Under the General Public License v2
abstract
full article
|
Curt Blake and Joseph Probst |
| 15 |
Easy Come, Easy Go: Copyright Infringement and the DMCA's Notice and Takedown Provision in Light of Rossi v. MPAA
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 16 |
The Failures and Promises of Canada’s Alternative Compensation System for Private Reproduction of Copyrighted Recordings
abstract
full article
|
Evgenia Fkiaras |
| 15 |
Cases in Wake of Dastar v. Twentieth Century Fox Continue to Narrow the Scope of a "Reverse Passing Off" Claim
In 2003, the United States Supreme Court decided Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp, narrowing the scope of protection under the federal Lanham Act for “reverse passing off.” “Reverse passing off” is derived from the statutory language in § 43(a) of the Lanham Act prohibiting a “false designation of origin” that is likely to cause consumer confusion and generally occurs where one company puts forth another company’s product as its own. A “reverse passing off” claim was also thought to be feasible against one who misrepresented the source of the creative or communicative work embodied in a product. In Dastar, however, the Court limited the ability to bring a claim of “reverse passing off” by narrowly defining the term “origin,” holding that “origin” refers only to the source of the tangible goods and not to the source of any idea, concept or communication embodied in the tangible goods. Following Dastar, several cases have further defined the scope of a “reverse passing off” claim. This Article introduces the concept of “reverse passing off” and then discusses the impact of Dastar and its application in subsequent cases.
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 259 |
Choose Your Words Wisely: Affirmative Representations as a Limit on § 230 Immunity
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey R. Doty |
| 297 |
A Survey of the DMCA’s Copyright Management Information Protections: The DMCA’s CMI Landscape After All Headline News and McClatchey
abstract
full article
|
Susuk Lim |
| 311 |
Jacobson Revisited: Conditions, Covenants and the Future of Open-Source Software Licenses
abstract
full article
|
Yamini Menon |
| 2 |
TrademarkDilution.com: Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp., and the Evolving Law of Trademark Dilution on the Internet
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 1 |
Broadening the Scope of Electronic Reproductions: The Interpretation of Section 201(c) in Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc.
abstract
full article
|
Shan Sivalingam |
| 3 |
Podcasting Pop Songs?: Licensing Concerns with Podcasts that contain Mainstream music
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 4 |
Patent Rights Under FOSS Licensing Schemes
abstract
full article
|
Shaobin Zhu |
| 2 |
Liability for Search Engine Triggering of Trademarked Keywords after Rescuecom
abstract
full article
|
Riana Pfefferkorn |
| 1 |
Walking from Cloud to Cloud: The Portability Issue in Cloud Computing
abstract
full article
|
Robert H. Carpenter, Jr. |
| 13 |
A Matter of Access: How Bypassing DRM Does Not Always Violate the DMCA
abstract
full article
|
Alicia Hoffer |
| 7 |
FRCP 19: A Preferable Alternative to Traditional Judicial Rules for Determining Patent Licensee Standing
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey Bashaw |
| 93 |
Neutralizing Actual Controversy: How Patent Holders Can Reduce the Risk of Declaratory Judgment in Patent Disputes
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 105 |
End User Liability for Software Developed with Trade Secrets
abstract
full article
|
Jeff Patterson |
| 135 |
Cross-Border Contributory Patent Infringement in Germany
abstract
full article
|
Prof. Dr. Heinz Goddar |
| 149 |
Copyright Infringement Liability of Placeshifting Services in the United States and Japan
abstract
full article
|
Naoya Isoda |
| 8 |
Copyright Liability for Those Who Provide the Means of Infringement: In light of the RIAA lawsuits, who is at risk for the infringing acts of others?
abstract
full article
|
Karen Horowitz |
| 14 |
The Limits of Expanding Patent Claim Scope to Provoke an Interference with a Competitor
abstract
full article
|
Christopher L. Kuyper |
| 171 |
The "Three Strikes" Policy in Korean Copyright Act 2009: Safe or Out?
abstract
full article
|
Sun-Young Moon & Daeup Kim |
| 217 |
“Capital” Punishment: Evaluating an Investor’s Secondary Copyright Infringement Liability after Veoh
abstract
full article
|
James L. Proctor, Jr. |
| 233 |
Exportability’s Effect on Process Patent Enforcement: Why § 271(f) Export Restrictions Do Not Apply to Intangible Process Claims
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 247 |
How Much is too Much? Copyright Protection of Short Portions of Text in the United States and European Union after Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades
abstract
full article
|
Connor Moran |
| 237 |
Cheaper Watches and Copyright Law: Navigating “Gray Markets” After the Supreme Court’s Split in Costco v. Omega, S.A.
abstract
full article
|
Parker A. Howell |
| 265 |
Loaded Question: Examining Loadable Kernel Modules Under the General Public License v2
abstract
full article
|
Curt Blake and Joseph Probst |
| 15 |
Easy Come, Easy Go: Copyright Infringement and the DMCA's Notice and Takedown Provision in Light of Rossi v. MPAA
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 16 |
The Failures and Promises of Canada’s Alternative Compensation System for Private Reproduction of Copyrighted Recordings
abstract
full article
|
Evgenia Fkiaras |
| 15 |
Cases in Wake of Dastar v. Twentieth Century Fox Continue to Narrow the Scope of a "Reverse Passing Off" Claim
In 2003, the United States Supreme Court decided Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp, narrowing the scope of protection under the federal Lanham Act for “reverse passing off.” “Reverse passing off” is derived from the statutory language in § 43(a) of the Lanham Act prohibiting a “false designation of origin” that is likely to cause consumer confusion and generally occurs where one company puts forth another company’s product as its own. A “reverse passing off” claim was also thought to be feasible against one who misrepresented the source of the creative or communicative work embodied in a product. In Dastar, however, the Court limited the ability to bring a claim of “reverse passing off” by narrowly defining the term “origin,” holding that “origin” refers only to the source of the tangible goods and not to the source of any idea, concept or communication embodied in the tangible goods. Following Dastar, several cases have further defined the scope of a “reverse passing off” claim. This Article introduces the concept of “reverse passing off” and then discusses the impact of Dastar and its application in subsequent cases.
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 259 |
Choose Your Words Wisely: Affirmative Representations as a Limit on § 230 Immunity
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey R. Doty |
| 297 |
A Survey of the DMCA’s Copyright Management Information Protections: The DMCA’s CMI Landscape After All Headline News and McClatchey
abstract
full article
|
Susuk Lim |
| 311 |
Jacobson Revisited: Conditions, Covenants and the Future of Open-Source Software Licenses
abstract
full article
|
Yamini Menon |
| 2 |
TrademarkDilution.com: Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp., and the Evolving Law of Trademark Dilution on the Internet
abstract
full article
|
Lawrence F. Rozsnyai |
| 1 |
Broadening the Scope of Electronic Reproductions: The Interpretation of Section 201(c) in Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc.
abstract
full article
|
Shan Sivalingam |
| 3 |
Podcasting Pop Songs?: Licensing Concerns with Podcasts that contain Mainstream music
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 4 |
Patent Rights Under FOSS Licensing Schemes
abstract
full article
|
Shaobin Zhu |
| 2 |
Liability for Search Engine Triggering of Trademarked Keywords after Rescuecom
abstract
full article
|
Riana Pfefferkorn |
| 1 |
Walking from Cloud to Cloud: The Portability Issue in Cloud Computing
abstract
full article
|
Robert H. Carpenter, Jr. |
| 13 |
A Matter of Access: How Bypassing DRM Does Not Always Violate the DMCA
abstract
full article
|
Alicia Hoffer |