Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts Issues
Volumes 1 - 5 were published under the journal name
"Shidler Journal of Law, Commerce + Technology".
Volume 8
Issue 4
Winter 2013
| Article | Title | Author |
|---|
| 457 |
What Your Tweet Doesn’t Say: Twitter, Non-Content Data, and the Stored Communications Act
abstract
full article
|
Daniel Shickich |
| 473 |
When Is a Phone a Computer?
abstract
full article
|
J.C. Lundberg |
| 487 |
Unchaining E-Discovery in the Patent Courts
abstract
full article
|
Daniel B. Garrie, Esq. and Yoav M. Griver, Esq. |
| 501 |
Personalized Medicine, Genetic Exceptionalism, and the Rule of Law: An Analysis of the Prevailing Justification for Invalidating BRCA1/2 Patents in Association of Molecular Pathology v. USPTO
abstract
full article
|
Kristen L. Burge |
Issue 3
Mobile Money Symposium 2013
| Article | Title | Author |
|---|
| 155 |
Introduction to Mobile Money in Developing Countries: Financial Inclusion and Financial Integrity Conference Special Issue
abstract
full article
|
Jane K. Winn and Louis de Koker |
| 165 |
The 2012 Revised FATF Recommendations: Assessing and Mitigating Mobile Money Integrity Risks Within the New Standards Framework
abstract
full article
|
Louis de Koker |
| 197 |
Governance of Global Mobile Money Networks:The Role of Technical Standards
abstract
full article
|
Jane K. Winn |
| 245 |
Privacy and Security Concerns Associated with Mobile Money Applications in Africa
abstract
full article
|
Andrew Harris, Seymour Goodman, and Patrick Traynor |
| 265 |
The Role of UNCITRAL Texts in Promoting a Harmonized Legal Framework for Cross-Border Mobile Payments
abstract
full article
|
Luca G. Castellani |
| 285 |
Mobile Money as an Engine of Financial Inclusion and Lynchpin of Financial Integrity
abstract
full article
|
Claire Alexandre and Lynn Chang Eisenhart |
| 303 |
The Role of Anti-Money Laundering Law in Mobile Money Systems in Developing Countries
abstract
full article
|
Emery S. Kobor |
| 317 |
Mobile Money, Financial Inclusion and Financial Integrity: The South African Case
abstract
full article
|
Vivienne A. Lawack |
| 347 |
M-Payments in Brazil: Notes on How a Country’s Background May Determine Timing and Design of a Regulatory Model
abstract
full article
|
Gilberto Martins de Almeida |
| 375 |
Safaricom and M-PESA in Kenya: Financial Inclusion and Financial Integrity
abstract
full article
|
Mercy W. Buku and Michael W. Meredith |
| 401 |
Reporting of Suspicious Activity by Mobile Money Service Providers in Accordance with International Standards: How Does it Impact on Financial Inclusion?
abstract
full article
|
Miriam Goldby |
| 419 |
Mobile Payments In The United States: How Disintermediation May Affect Delivery of Payment Functions, Financial Inclusion and Anti-Money Laundering Issues
abstract
full article
|
Erin F. Fonté |
Issue 2
Fall 2012
| Article | Title | Author |
|---|
| 79 |
Whose Invention Is It Anyway? Employee Invention-Assignment Agreements and Their Limits
abstract
full article
|
Parker A. Howell |
| 107 |
Social Media Policies for Character and Fitness Evaluations
abstract
full article
|
Jessica Belle |
| 123 |
Googling Jurors to Conduct Voir Dire
abstract
full article
|
J.C. Lundberg |
| 137 |
Get Outta My Face[book]: The Discoverability of Social Networking Data and the Passwords Needed to Access Them
abstract
full article
|
Mallory Allen & Aaron Orheim |
Issue 1
Summer 2012
| Article | Title | Author |
|---|
| 1 |
Finding Safe Harbor: Navigating Washington's New Unfair Competition Law
Under a new law, manufacturers and retailers that sell products in Washington State could face stiff penalties if their products are made using stolen or misappropriated information technology (“stolen IT”). In 2011 the Washington Legislature passed Substitute House Bill 1495, creating a new cause of action that allows private plaintiffs or the state attorney general to seek injunctive relief and damages against manufacturers that use stolen IT in their business operations. The law also creates an additional claim for actual damages of up to $250,000 against third parties who contract with violating manufacturers and sell the products in Washington. Using unfair competition law to address problems of piracy and infringement is a novel and unproven approach; it remains to be seen how companies will use the law, and how effective the law will prove in changing the behavior of manufacturers and their third-party business partners. This Article explores the legislative history and operation of the new Washington law, including the requirements for liability and “safe harbors” shielding businesses from enforcement. This Article also considers possible federal preemption challenges based on the law’s potential overlap withcopyright law and federal commerce powers.
full article
|
Daniel Shickich |
| 29 |
Facebook Firings and Twitter Terminations: The National Labor Relations Act as a Limit on Retaliatory Discharge
abstract
full article
|
Bryan Russell |
| 43 |
Technology, Travel Companies & Taxation: Should Expedia Be Required to Collect and Remit State Occupancy Taxes on Profits from Facilitating Hotel Room Rentals?
abstract
full article
|
Kerra J. Melvin |
| 61 |
Who Are You? Difficulties in Obtaining Trademark Protection for Domain Names
abstract
full article
|
Luke M. Rona |