Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts Issues
Volumes 1 - 5 were published under the journal name
"Shidler Journal of Law, Commerce + Technology".
Volume 7
Issue 4
Spring 2012
| Article | Title | Author |
|---|
| 319 |
Foreword
abstract
full article
|
Martin J. Adelman |
| 325 |
Developments in the Jurisprudence on the Use of Experts
abstract
full article
|
Hon. Marilyn L. Huff |
| 335 |
Tuning the Obviousness Inquiry After KSR
abstract
full article
|
Mark D. Janis |
| 353 |
Patent Law's Falstaff: Inequitable Conduct, the Federal Circuit, and Therasense
abstract
full article
|
John M. Golden |
| 379 |
Chief Judge Rader's Contribution to Comparative Patent Law
abstract
full article
|
Toshiko Takenaka |
| 405 |
Antiformalism at the Federal Circuit: The Jurisprudence of Chief Judge Rader
abstract
full article
|
Peter Lee |
| 427 |
Celebrating Contributions of Chief Judge Rader to Patent Infringement Jurisprudence
abstract
full article
|
Katherine E. White |
| 445 |
Fostering the Business of Innovation: The Untold Story of Bowers v. Baystate Technologies
abstract
full article
|
Robert W. Gomulkiewicz |
| 467 |
Chief Judge Rader's Material Contribution to Geographic Indicator Analysis
abstract
full article
|
Signe H. Naeve |
| 501 |
Influencing the Evolving IP System and Law Through International Outreach
abstract
full article
|
Esther H. Lim |
| 515 |
Efforts to Establish Clear Standards for Exhaustion in Japan
abstract
full article
|
Kaoru Kuroda and Eiji Katayama |
Issue 3
Winter 2012
| Article | Title | Author |
|---|
| 209 |
Understanding and Authenticating Evidence from Social Networking Sites
abstract
full article
|
Heather L. Griffith |
| 225 |
Let's Be Cautious Friends: The Ethical Implications of Social Networking for Members of the Judiciary
abstract
full article
|
Aurora J. Wilson |
| 237 |
Cheaper Watches and Copyright Law: Navigating “Gray Markets” After the Supreme Court’s Split in Costco v. Omega, S.A.
abstract
full article
|
Parker A. Howell |
| 265 |
Loaded Question: Examining Loadable Kernel Modules Under the General Public License v2
abstract
full article
|
Curt Blake and Joseph Probst |
| 295 |
Internet as a Human Right: A Practical Legal Framework to Address the Unique Nature of the Medium and to Promote Development
abstract
full article
|
Young Joon Lim and Sarah E. Sexton |
Issue 2
Fall 2011
| Article | Title | Author |
|---|
| 75 |
Ninth Circuit Unmasks Anonymous Internet Users and Lowers the Bar for Disclosure of Online Speakers
abstract
full article
|
Mallory Allen |
| 93 |
Juror Investigation: Is In-Courtroom Internet Research Going Too Far?
abstract
full article
|
Duncan Stark |
| 105 |
End User Liability for Software Developed with Trade Secrets
abstract
full article
|
Jeff Patterson |
| 121 |
Discovery of Breathalyzer Source Code in DUI Prosecutions
abstract
full article
|
Aurora J. Wilson |
| 135 |
Cross-Border Contributory Patent Infringement in Germany
abstract
full article
|
Prof. Dr. Heinz Goddar |
| 149 |
Copyright Infringement Liability of Placeshifting Services in the United States and Japan
abstract
full article
|
Naoya Isoda |
Issue 1
Summer 2011
| Article | Title | Author |
|---|
| 1 |
Broadcasting Expectations: An Unprotected Wireless Network Takes on Constitutional Dimensions
abstract
full article
|
Duncan Stark |
| 13 |
A Matter of Access: How Bypassing DRM Does Not Always Violate the DMCA
abstract
full article
|
Alicia Hoffer |
| 27 |
Off With the Head? How Eliminating Search and Index Functionality Reduces Secondary Liability in Peer-To-Peer File-Sharing Cases
abstract
full article
|
Luke M. Rona |
| 47 |
Injunction Relief: Must Nonparty Websites Obey Court Orders to Remove User Content?
Websites are normally immune to suits arising from illegal user-posted content due to 42 USC § 230. Victims of illegal postings must therefore bring suit, if at all, against the original posters. However, when websites refuse to take down illegal content, a suit against an original poster might not provide relief. In the recent case Blockowicz v. Williams, a family won a default judgment against persons posting defamatory content to Ripoff Report. But the plaintiffs could not contact the defendant to enforce the judgment, and thus they sought enforcement of an injunction against Ripoff Report. The court refused because Ripoff Report was not a party to the action. As a result, the top Google hit for the Blockowicz family name remains a defamatory posting. This Article considers how the traditional exceptions to the rule that injunctions do not bind nonparties apply in the context of the relationship between a poster and a website and when, if ever, a nonparty website might be bound by an injunction against a poster. This Article also discusses alternative remedies plaintiffs can seek if they are unable to obtain an injunction against a nonparty website.
full article
|
Connor Moran |
| 59 |
Fair Notice: Providing for Electronic Document Transmissions to Shareholders in Washington State
abstract
full article
|
James L. Proctor, Jr. |