UW School of Law > LTA Journal > Back Issues

Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts Issues

Volumes 1 - 5 were published under the journal name "Shidler Journal of Law, Commerce + Technology".

Volume 6

Issue 4 Spring 2011

ArticleTitleAuthor
259 Choose Your Words Wisely: Affirmative Representations as a Limit on § 230 Immunity

abstract   full article

Jeffrey R. Doty
273 United States v. Berger: The Rejection of  Civil Loss Causation Principles in Connection with Criminal Securities Fraud

abstract   full article

James A. Jones II
285 Gimme a Brekka!: Deciphering “Authorization” Under the CFAA and How Employers Can Protect Their Data

abstract   full article

Amber L. Leaders
297 A Survey of the DMCA’s Copyright Management Information Protections: The DMCA’s CMI Landscape After All Headline News and McClatchey

abstract   full article

Susuk Lim
311

Jacobson Revisited: Conditions, Covenants and the Future of Open-Source Software Licenses 

abstract   full article

Yamini Menon

Issue 3 Winter 2011

ArticleTitleAuthor
171 The "Three Strikes" Policy in Korean Copyright Act 2009: Safe or Out?

abstract   full article

Sun-Young Moon & Daeup Kim
185 Standardizing Warhol: Antitrust Liability for Denying the Authenticity of Artwork

abstract   full article

Gareth S. Lacy
217 “Capital” Punishment: Evaluating an Investor’s Secondary Copyright Infringement Liability after Veoh

In UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Veoh Networks, Inc., the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California considered claims that investors in a privately-held corporation were secondarily liable for copyright infringement. The Veoh court findings, which set outcurrent secondary copy-right infringement law, provide guidance for investors by clarifying their potential liability forcopyright infringement committed by the company in which they invested. However, because the decision was fact-specific, this guidance is incomplete. For example, the court found that the investor neither controlled the infringing activities nor reaped direct financial benefit from them. This leaves open for further decisions the situation in which only one factor is present. In addition, Veoh bases secondary liability on such subjective concepts as “control,” “supervision,” “ability to supervise,” “reason to know,” “material assistance,” “encouragement to infringe,” and “direct financial interest.” Therefore, future cases involving similar facts are susceptible to contrary results based on the court’s interpretation of these concepts. This Article examines the standards established and the cases distinguished by the Veoh court to determine conditions under which an investor may be held liable for the copyright infringement of the investment targetand proposes practical steps to minimize liability exposure.

full article

James L. Proctor, Jr.
233 Exportability’s Effect on Process Patent Enforcement: Why § 271(f) Export Restrictions Do Not Apply to Intangible Process Claims

abstract   full article

Homer Yang-hsien Hsu
247 How Much is too Much? Copyright Protection of Short Portions of Text in the United States and European Union after Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades

abstract   full article

Connor Moran

Issue 2 Autumn 2010

ArticleTitleAuthor
93 Neutralizing Actual Controversy: How Patent Holders Can Reduce the Risk of Declaratory Judgment in Patent Disputes

abstract   full article

Homer Yang-hsien Hsu
111 Outsider Hacking and Insider Trading: The Expansion of Liability Absent a Fiduciary Duty

abstract   full article

James A. Jones II
125 Inducement or Solicitation? Competing Interpretations of the “Underlying Illegality” Test in the Wake of Roommates.com

abstract   full article

Jeffrey R. Doty
143 Location Surveillance by GPS: Balancing an Employer’s Business Interest with Employee Privacy

abstract   full article

Kendra Rosenberg
155 Death of the Spam Wrangler: CAN-SPAM Private Plaintiffs Required to Show Actual Harm

abstract   full article

Susuk Lim

Issue 1 Summer 2010

ArticleTitleAuthor
1 Walking from Cloud to Cloud: The Portability Issue in Cloud Computing

abstract   full article

Robert H. Carpenter, Jr.
15 Arbitration Nation: Wireless Services Providers and Class Action Waivers

abstract   full article

Alexander J. Casey
33 Mobile Marketing Derailed: How Curbing Cell-Phone Spam in Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster May Have Banned Text-Message Advertising

abstract   full article

Gareth S. Lacy
49 Communications Decency Act Provides No Safe Harbor Against Antifraud Liability or Hyperlinks to Third-Party Content Under the Securities and Exchange Act

abstract   full article

Sheri Wardwell
67 Stevens v. Publicis: The Rise of "No E-Mail Modification" Clauses?

abstract   full article

Stephanie Holmes
83 Trusting the Machines: New York State Bar Ethics Opinion Allows Attorneys to Use Gmail

abstract   full article

Kevin Raudebaugh