Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts Issues
Volumes 1 - 5 were published under the journal name
"Shidler Journal of Law, Commerce + Technology".
Volume 6
Issue 4
Spring 2011
| Article | Title | Author |
|---|
| 259 |
Choose Your Words Wisely: Affirmative Representations as a Limit on § 230 Immunity
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey R. Doty |
| 273 |
United States v. Berger: The Rejection of Civil Loss Causation Principles in Connection with Criminal Securities Fraud
abstract
full article
|
James A. Jones II |
| 285 |
Gimme a Brekka!: Deciphering “Authorization” Under the CFAA and How Employers Can Protect Their Data
abstract
full article
|
Amber L. Leaders |
| 297 |
A Survey of the DMCA’s Copyright Management Information Protections: The DMCA’s CMI Landscape After All Headline News and McClatchey
abstract
full article
|
Susuk Lim |
| 311 |
Jacobson Revisited: Conditions, Covenants and the Future of Open-Source Software Licenses
abstract
full article
|
Yamini Menon |
Issue 3
Winter 2011
| Article | Title | Author |
|---|
| 171 |
The "Three Strikes" Policy in Korean Copyright Act 2009: Safe or Out?
abstract
full article
|
Sun-Young Moon & Daeup Kim |
| 185 |
Standardizing Warhol: Antitrust Liability for Denying the Authenticity of Artwork
abstract
full article
|
Gareth S. Lacy |
| 217 |
“Capital” Punishment: Evaluating an Investor’s Secondary Copyright Infringement Liability after Veoh
abstract
full article
|
James L. Proctor, Jr. |
| 233 |
Exportability’s Effect on Process Patent Enforcement: Why § 271(f) Export Restrictions Do Not Apply to Intangible Process Claims
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 247 |
How Much is too Much? Copyright Protection of Short Portions of Text in the United States and European Union after Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades
abstract
full article
|
Connor Moran |
Issue 2
Autumn 2010
| Article | Title | Author |
|---|
| 93 |
Neutralizing Actual Controversy: How Patent Holders Can Reduce the Risk of Declaratory Judgment in Patent Disputes
abstract
full article
|
Homer Yang-hsien Hsu |
| 111 |
Outsider Hacking and Insider Trading: The Expansion of Liability Absent a Fiduciary Duty
abstract
full article
|
James A. Jones II |
| 125 |
Inducement or Solicitation? Competing Interpretations of the “Underlying Illegality” Test in the Wake of Roommates.com
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey R. Doty |
| 143 |
Location Surveillance by GPS: Balancing an Employer’s Business Interest with Employee Privacy
abstract
full article
|
Kendra Rosenberg |
| 155 |
Death of the Spam Wrangler: CAN-SPAM Private Plaintiffs Required to Show Actual Harm
abstract
full article
|
Susuk Lim |
Issue 1
Summer 2010
| Article | Title | Author |
|---|
| 1 |
Walking from Cloud to Cloud: The Portability Issue in Cloud Computing
abstract
full article
|
Robert H. Carpenter, Jr. |
| 15 |
Arbitration Nation: Wireless Services Providers and Class Action Waivers
abstract
full article
|
Alexander J. Casey |
| 33 |
Mobile Marketing Derailed: How Curbing Cell-Phone Spam in Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster May Have Banned Text-Message Advertising
abstract
full article
|
Gareth S. Lacy |
| 49 |
Communications Decency Act Provides No Safe Harbor Against Antifraud Liability or Hyperlinks to Third-Party Content Under the Securities and Exchange Act
abstract
full article
|
Sheri Wardwell |
| 67 |
Stevens v. Publicis: The Rise of "No E-Mail Modification" Clauses?
abstract
full article
|
Stephanie Holmes |
| 83 |
Trusting the Machines: New York State Bar Ethics Opinion Allows Attorneys to Use Gmail
Information technology is evolving at an unprecedented rate; new forms of communication appear so often that it is difficult to keep track of them all. This presents a difficult problem for attorneys, who must carefully consider whether using new technology to communicate with clients is consistent with the duty of confidentiality. Google’s Gmail scans the content of e-mails to generate targeted advertising, a controversial practice that raises questions about whether its users have a reasonable expectation of privacy. The New York Bar responded to this issue in Opinion 820, which states that using an e-mail provider that scans the e-mail content to display relevant advertising does not violate a lawyer’s duty of client confidentiality. This article explains the controversial nature of Gmail, the evolution of e-mail in ethics opinions, and Opinion 820’s content and implications.
full article
|
Kevin Raudebaugh |