Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts Issues
Volumes 1 - 5 were published under the journal name
"Shidler Journal of Law, Commerce + Technology".
Volume 4
Issue 4
Spring 2008
| Article | Title | Author |
|---|
| 11 |
Liability for Consumer Information Security Breaches: Deconstructing FTC Complaints against Businesses Victimized by Consumer Information Security Breaches
abstract
full article
|
Joel B. Hanson |
| 12 |
No Harm No Foul: Limits on Damages Awards for Individuals Subject to a Data Breach
abstract
full article
|
Derek A. Bishop |
| 13 |
To Mine or Not to Mine: Recent Developments in the Legal Ethics Debate Regarding Metadata
abstract
full article
|
Boris Reznikov |
Issue 3
Winter 2008
| Article | Title | Author |
|---|
| 8 |
Copyright Liability for Those Who Provide the Means of Infringement: In light of the RIAA lawsuits, who is at risk for the infringing acts of others?
abstract
full article
|
Karen Horowitz |
| 9 |
Data Privacy and Breach Reporting: Compliance with Varying State Laws
abstract
full article
|
G. Martin Bingisser |
| 10 |
Applying the Americans with Disabilities Act to Private Websites after National Federation of the Blind v. Target
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey Bashaw |
Issue 2
Autumn 2007
| Article | Title | Author |
|---|
| 5 |
"Can I See Some ID?" Age Verification Requirements for the Online Liquor Store
abstract
full article
|
Boris Reznikov |
| 6 |
Admitting Computer Record Evidence after In Re Vinhnee: A Stricter Standard for the Future?
abstract
full article
|
Cooper Offenbecher |
| 7 |
FRCP 19: A Preferable Alternative to Traditional Judicial Rules for Determining Patent Licensee Standing
abstract
full article
|
Jeffrey Bashaw |
Issue 1
Summer 2007
| Article | Title | Author |
|---|
| 1 |
Employee Internet Misuse: How Failing to Investigate Pornography May Lead To Tort Liability
This Article addresses a New Jersey appellate court’s holding which suggests that employers have a common law duty to investigate online misconduct by their employees. In Doe v. XYC Corp., the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey held that an employer has a duty to act when (1) it knows that an employee’s use of the Internet would endanger a third person; and (2) it has reason to believe that it may discipline the employee for online activities in the workplace. The court stated that, under this duty to act, an employer must investigate, discipline, and inform authorities of the danger. This Article discusses the implications of the case for employers.
full article
|
Jamila Johnson |
| 2 |
Don't Bet on it: How Complying with Federal Internet Gambling Law is not Enough
abstract
full article
|
Jennifer W. Chiang |
| 3 |
Reach Out and Text Someone: How Text Message Spam May Be a Call Under the TCPA
abstract
full article
|
Daniel L. Hadjinian |
| 4 |
Patent Rights Under FOSS Licensing Schemes
abstract
full article
|
Shaobin Zhu |