Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts Issues
Volumes 1 - 5 were published under the journal name
"Shidler Journal of Law, Commerce + Technology".
Volume 3
Issue 4
Spring 2007
| Article | Title | Author |
|---|
| 13 |
Digitized Book Search Engines and Copyright Concerns
abstract
full article
|
Ari Okano |
| 14 |
When is § 230 Immunity Lost?: The Transformation from Website Owner to Information Content Provider
abstract
full article
|
Karen Alexander Horowitz |
| 15 |
Cases in Wake of Dastar v. Twentieth Century Fox Continue to Narrow the Scope of a "Reverse Passing Off" Claim
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 16 |
Electronic Health Records: Interoperability Challenges Patients' Right to Privacy
abstract
full article
|
Laura Dunlop |
Issue 3
Winter 2007
| Article | Title | Author |
|---|
| 8 |
Follow that Car! Legal issues arising from installation of tracking devices in leased consumer goods and equipment
abstract
full article
|
Leah Altaras |
| 9 |
Suing Based on Spyware? Admissibility of Evidence Obtained from Spyware in Violation of Federal and State Wiretap Laws
abstract
full article
|
Shan Sivalingam |
| 10 |
Client Confidentiality, Professional Privilege and Online Communication: Potential Implications of the Barton Decision
abstract
full article
|
Kelcey Nichols |
| 11 |
Enforcement of Contractual Terms in Clickwrap Agreements: Courts Refusing to Enforce Forum Selection and Binding Arbitration Clauses
abstract
full article
|
Rachel Cormier Anderson |
| 12 |
E-Contract Formation: U.S. and EU Perspective
abstract
full article
|
Sylvia Mercado Kierkegaard |
Issue 2
Autumn 2006
| Article | Title | Author |
|---|
| 5 |
Clicking Away the Competition: The Legal Ramifications of Click Fraud for Companies that Offer Pay Per Click Advertising Services
abstract
full article
|
Daniel L. Hadjinian |
| 6 |
Hiding Evidence from the Boss: Attorney-Client Privilege and Company Computers
abstract
full article
|
Kelcey Nichols |
| 7 |
To Serve and Protect: Do Businesses Have a Legal Duty to Protect Collections of Personal Information?
Commercial, governmental, and nonprofit organizations are more frequently reporting instances of data security breaches. This has, in turn, raised fears of identity theft. In some limited instances, companies that maintain large amounts of personal information — such as credit reporting agencies — have been subject to statutory duties to protect that personal information. In some instances, such legislation has also permitted a private cause of action for breach of these duties. Legislatures have expanded these statutes to encompass, at least to a limited degree, all business entities that collect personal information. Recent precedent indicates that courts may follow this trend by declaring security breaches generally foreseeable, and finding a common law duty on the part of companies to protect their data. The ability of a plaintiff to prove compensable harm from the negligent release of personal information, however, may be more difficult than showing the existence of a duty.
full article
|
Derek A. Bishop |
Issue 1
Summer 2006
| Article | Title | Author |
|---|
| 1 |
Broadening the Scope of Electronic Reproductions: The Interpretation of Section 201(c) in Faulkner v. National Geographic Enterprises Inc.
abstract
full article
|
Shan Sivalingam |
| 2 |
The Union Workplace Meets Big Brother: Advising clients on employer conduct with regard to hidden surveillance
abstract
full article
|
Jamila Asha Johnson |
| 3 |
Podcasting Pop Songs?: Licensing Concerns with Podcasts that contain Mainstream music
abstract
full article
|
Jared Barrett |
| 4 |
Don't Send that E-Mail to a Minor!: Compliance with State Child Protection Registry Statutes
abstract
full article
|
Laura Dunlop |